|
Leeds HMO Lobby
Home
What is a HMO?
The Lobby
Origins
Aims
Constitution
Members
Reports
Publications
Local Action
Developments
Policy Papers
Studentification in Leeds
National Action
Developments
Representations
Use Classes Order
HMO Licensing
Students & Community
National HMO Lobby
Contact
Leeds HMO Lobby
Links
|
|
Representation on
Tetley Hall Redevelopment
by Pickard Properties
Leeds HMO Lobby is a coalition of all the local community associations
in Inner NW Leeds, concerned with the imbalance of housing provision
(and therefore of the demographics) in the Area. The Lobby wishes
to make three points in relation to the Tetley Hall Redevelopment
by Pickard Properties.
First, Leeds HMO Lobby wishes to note the fact
that the housing and demographic imbalance in Inner NW
Leeds is widely recognised. Leeds City Council in fact has established
the Shared Housing Group specifically to address the problem. It
is chaired by Cllr Hamilton (Headingley Ward), and comprises not
only the Council, but also both universities and their student unions,
as well as the Lobby - and Leeds Property Association. Several policies
now address the situation.
(a) The SHG itself has adopted a Shared Housing Action Plan, one
of whose objectives is "To reduce the number of students in
full-time education accommodated within the Area of Housing Mix
as a proportion of the population, by the Census in 2011" (to
which of course, the LPA and thus Pickard Properties subscribes).
(b) The Revised UDP (2006) has adopted Policy H15, which resists
student housing in the Area of Housing Mix.
(c) The Inner NW Area Committee is preparing a Housing Strategy
specific to the Area of Housing Mix, intended to restore to the
Area a mixed and balanced community.
Secondly, in the light of these policies, Leeds HMO Lobby opposes
Option A, Student Residential, of the Tetley Hall Redevelopment
Project.
(a) Most obviously, Option A is directly contrary to everything
the Council and others are doing to restore diversity to the Area.
In particular, this Option subverts the action taken by the University
of Leeds - when the University has dispensed with 200 student bedspaces,
it would be perverse to see these replaced by 250 in the new development.
(b) What's more, experience elsewhere shows that student housing
developments attract further student housing in the vicinity - for
instance, around Kirkstall Brewery or Sugarwell Court (students
like to congregate with their fellows). Other provision on the site
intended for private residents would be bought by landlords or parents
for student housing.
(c) Finally, a concentration of students on the site can only deter
other residents from considering settling there. How many families
would ever dream of setting up home next door to 250+ students?!
Thirdly, Leeds HMO Lobby supports Option B, Private
Residential, of the Tetley Hall Redevelopment Project. Our
Area badly needs housing provision to re-balance our community.
The Lobby urges the development to take measures to ensure such
provision is secured.
(a) For instance, the redevelopment should include no accommodation
which lends itself to (multiple) student occupation, like large
or cluster flats.
(b) The development could also include restrictive covenants on
all the properties, prohibiting multiple occupation.
Leeds HMO Lobby looks forward to the development of the Tetley
Hall site in the interests of the community as whole.
Dr Richard Tyler, Co-ordinator, Leeds HMO Lobby
30 July 2007
Leeds HMO Lobby
email: hmolobby@hotmail.com
website: www.hmolobby.org.uk/leeds
|